Volume 104; Issue 11
1st October 2017
Leading article
Authors: K. J. Roberts
Systematic review
Authors: A. Aber, E. Poku, P. Phillips, M. Essat, H. Buckley Woods, S. Palfreyman et al.
Notes: AVVQ and SF‐36 good options
Systematic review
Authors: S. Erridge, P. H. Pucher, S. R. Markar, G. Malietzis, T. Athanasiou, A. Darzi et al.
Notes: No evidence for best treatment
Randomized clinical trial
Authors: C. Palanivelu, P. Senthilnathan, S. C. Sabnis, N. S. Babu, S. Srivatsan Gurumurthy, N. Anand Vijai et al.
Notes: Shorter stay
Randomized clinical trial
Authors: M. Andersson, B. Kolodziej, R. E. Andersson, R. E. Andersson, M. Andersson, T. Eriksson et al.
Notes: Reduces imaging and admissions
Randomized clinical trial
Authors: S. B. Ellebæk, C. W. Fristrup, C. Hovendal, N. Qvist, L. Bundgaard, S. Salomon et al.
Notes: No additional benefit
Original article
Authors: R. R. W. Brady, S. J. Chapman, S. Atallah, M. Chand, J. Mayol, A. M. Lacy et al.
Notes: Social media linking those with interest in coloproctology
Original article
Authors: I. D. van Koeverden, S. T. W. van Haelst, S. Haitjema, J.‐P. P. M. de Vries, F. L. Moll, H. M. den Ruijter et al.
Notes: No decline in events
Original article
Authors: J. Golledge, J. Moxon, J. Pinchbeck, G. Anderson, S. Rowbotham, J. Jenkins et al.
Notes: Worth an RCT
Original article
Authors: L. Dihge, P.‐O. Bendahl, L. Rydén
Notes: Defines need for staging?
Original article
Authors: C. Wadsten, H. Garmo, I. Fredriksson, M. Sund, F. Wärnberg
Notes: Rare, but worse for large tumours and uncertain margins
Original article
Authors: J. B. Wang, K. Wu, L. H. Shi, Y. Y. Sun, F. B. Li, L. Xie et al.
Notes: Simple and efficient
Original article
Authors: Z. Al‐Qurayshi, E. Kandil, G. W. Randolph
Notes: Cost‐effective in this scenario
Original article
Authors: R. Ahola, A. Siiki, K. Vasama, M. Vornanen, J. Sand, J. Laukkarinen et al.
Notes: Centralization influences long‐term survival
Original article
Authors: R. Ravikumar, C. Sabin, M. Abu Hilal, A. Al‐Hilli, S. Aroori, G. Bond‐Smith et al.
Notes: No difference between type of reconstruction
Original article
Authors: T. Maeta, T. Ebata, E. Hayashi, T. Kawahara, S. Mizuno, N. Matsumoto et al.
Notes: Poor survival despite portal vein resection
Original article
Authors: D. Kleive, M. A. Sahakyan, A. E. Berstad, C. S. Verbeke, I. P. Gladhaug, B. Edwin et al.
Notes: Severe complications, more reoperations
Original article
Authors: L. G. M. van der Geest, V. E. P. P. Lemmens, I. H. J. T. de Hingh, C. J. H. M. van Laarhoven, T. L. Bollen, C. Y. Nio et al.
Notes: Negative impacts
Article
Authors: J. Ranstam, J. A. Cook