The international surgical journal with global reach

This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

Value of Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center nomogram in clinical decision making for sentinel lymph node‐positive breast cancer. BJS 2010; 97: 1653-1658.

Published: 16th July 2010

Authors: I. van den Hoven, G. P. Kuijt, A. C. Voogd, M. W. P. M. van Beek, R. M. H. Roumen

Background

The aim of this study was to determine the value of the Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram for individual decision making in a Dutch cohort of women with breast cancer with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) but at low risk of additional nodal metastases.

Method

Data were collected on 168 patients with a positive SLN who underwent completion axillary lymph node dissection. The predicted probability of non‐SLN metastases was calculated for each patient, using the MSKCC nomogram. Specificity and false‐negative rates were calculated for subgroups with a predicted risk of no more than 5, 10 or 15 per cent. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) calculated.

Results

The discrimination of the MSKCC nomogram, measured by the AUC, was 0·68. For low predicted probability cut‐off values of no more than 5, 10 and 15 per cent, the false‐negative rates were 20, 14 and 19 per cent, and the specificities were 4, 27 and 32 per cent, respectively. The low‐risk category (5 per cent or less) consisted of only 3·0 per cent of the study population.

Conclusion

The performance of the MSKCC nomogram was insufficient to make it a useful tool for individual decision making in this cohort of women with SLN‐positive breast cancer. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full text