This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

Validation of international consensus guidelines for the resection of branch duct‐type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. BJS 2014; 101: 686-692.

Published: 25th March 2014

Authors: J.‐Y. Jang, T. Park, S. Lee, M. J. Kang, S. Y. Lee, K. B. Lee et al.

Background

Classifications of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) remain ambiguous, especially for the mixed type. Factors predicting malignancy remain unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of factors predicting malignancy in the new international consensus guidelines for resection of branch duct‐type (BD)‐IPMN and to compare them with those in the previous version.

Method

A prospectively collected database of patients with biopsy‐proven BD‐IPMN was analysed to compare factors between the first and second consensus guidelines, particularly as predictors of malignancy.

Results

Of 350 patients with BD‐IPMN, sensitivity (0·724) and balanced accuracy (0·751) of the second guidelines were superior to those (0·639 and 0·730) in the first version at the expense of slightly reduced specificity (0·779 versus 0·822 for the first version) by random forest models. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that main pancreatic duct dilatation greater than 5 mm (hazard ratio (HR) 4·54, 95 per cent confidence interval 2·45 to 8·41; P < 0·001), mural nodules (HR 6·27, 3·27 to 12·01; P < 0·001) and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 level above 37 units/ml (HR 4·03, 1·83 to 8·90; P = 0·001) were independent predictors of BD‐IPMN malignancy.

Conclusion

The new consensus guidelines provide better sensitivity, performance of factors predicting malignancy, and balanced accuracy in the diagnosis of BD‐IPMN malignancy. Size alone was limited in predicting malignancy. Variability in clinical significance of the individual factors associated with a risk of malignancy indicates the need for a tailored approach in the management of patients with BD‐IPMN.

Full text

You may also be interested in

Systematic review

Systematic review of functional outcome and quality of life after total pancreatectomy.

Authors: L. Scholten, T. F. Stoop, M. Del Chiaro, O. R. Busch, C. van Eijck, I. Q. Molenaar et al.

Original article

Multicentre observational cohort study of implementation and outcomes of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.

Authors: S. Lof, A. L. Moekotte, B. Al‐Sarireh, B. Ammori, S. Aroori, D. Durkin et al.

Systematic review

Meta‐analysis of recurrence pattern after resection for pancreatic cancer.

Authors: M. Tanaka, A. L. Mihaljevic, P. Probst, M. Heckler, U. Klaiber, U. Heger et al.

Original article

Multicentre analysis of the learning curve for laparoscopic liver resection of the posterosuperior segments. BJS 2019; 106: 1512-1522.

Authors: G. Berardi, D. Aghayan, Å. A. Fretland, H. Elberm, F. Cipriani, A. Spagnoli et al.

Original article

Validation of a nomogram to predict the risk of cancer in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm and main duct dilatation of 10 mm or less.

Authors: W. Jung, T. Park, Y. Kim, H. Park, Y. Han, J. He et al.

Original article

Secondary technical resectability of colorectal cancer liver metastases after chemotherapy with or without selective internal radiotherapy in the randomized SIRFLOX trial.

Authors: B. Garlipp, P. Gibbs, G. A. Van Hazel, R. Jeyarajah, R. C. G. Martin, C. J. Bruns et al.

Original article

Benign hilar bile duct strictures resected as perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. BJS 2019; 106: 1504-1511.

Authors: S. Otsuka, T. Ebata, Y. Yokoyama, T. Igami, T. Mizuno, J. Yamaguchi et al.

Systematic review

Meta‐analysis of the association between primary tumour location and prognosis after surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases.

Authors: X.‐Y. Wang, R. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y. Geng, J. Lin, K. Ma et al.

Original article

Mortality after liver surgery in Germany. BJS 2019; 106: 1523-1529.

Authors: N. Filmann, D. Walter, E. Schadde, C. Bruns, T. Keck, H. Lang et al.

Original article

Quality of life from a randomized trial of laparoscopic or open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. BJS 2019; 106: 1372-1380.

Authors: Å. A. Fretland, V. J. Dagenborg, G. M. Waaler Bjørnelv, D. L. Aghayan, A. M. Kazaryan, L. Barkhatov et al.

Original article

Safety and efficacy of transarterial embolization of hepatocellular adenomas. BJS 2019; 106: 1362-1371.

Authors: B. V. van Rosmalen, A. J. Klompenhouwer, J. Jaap de Graeff, M. P. D. Haring, V. E. de Meijer, L. Rifai et al.

Original article

Perioperative outcomes and long‐term quality of life after total pancreatectomy.

Authors: A. Pulvirenti, A. Pea, N. Rezaee, C. Gasparini, G. Malleo, M. J. Weiss et al.