The international surgical journal with global reach

This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS

Potential clinical implications of direction of a trans‐sphincteric anal fistula track. BJS 2003; 90: 1250-1255.

Published: 22nd September 2003

Authors: G. N. Buchanan, A. B. Williams, C. I. Bartram, S. Halligan, R. J. Nicholls, C. R. G. Cohen et al.

Background

The longitudinal direction of a trans‐sphincteric anal fistula track through the anal sphincter complex may have implications regarding fistulotomy.

Method

The angle of the track of trans‐sphincteric fistulas relative to the longitudinal axis of the anal canal was measured before operation by means of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 46 patients. This was compared with the findings at operation.

Results

The track passed cranially as well as laterally at an acute angle (less than 90° ) in 23 patients while it passed either transversely or caudally at an obtuse angle (90° or more) in the remaining 23. The internal opening was significantly higher in relation to the dentate line (above in eight patients, at the dentate line in 14 and below in one patient) when the track was acute than when it was obtuse (above in one, at the dentate line in 17 and below in five patients) (P = 0·004). The fistula track crossed the sphincter at a median angle of 35°, 95° and 132° from internal openings sited above, at and below dentate line level respectively (P = 0·002).

Conclusion

Fistula tracks passed cranially and laterally through the sphincter complex in half of these patients, and were most acutely angled on MRI when internal openings were situated above the dentate line. Preoperative MRI might alert surgeons to the potential hazard of fistulotomy being more extensive than anticipated from simple palpation of the level of the internal opening. Copyright © 2003 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Full text