This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS
Compliance with enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery. BJS 2010; 97: 754-758.
Published: 16th March 2010
Authors: J. Ahmed, S. Khan, M. Gatt, R. Kallam, J. MacFie
Background
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are often criticized for being difficult to implement outside clinical trials. This audit evaluated compliance with an ERAS protocol and compared it with that during a trial.
Method
Compliance was audited by case‐note review of 100 consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery. This was compared with the compliance in a group of 95 patients who participated in a clinical trial.
Results
Fewer patients in the audit group than in the study group received preoperative oral carbohydrate loading (61·0 versus 96 per cent; P < 0·001), a transverse incision (25·0 versus 39 per cent; P = 0·037), early fluid and diet reintroduction (73·0 versus 99 per cent; P < 0·001), and non‐opiate postoperative oral analgesia (70·0 versus 99 per cent; P < 0·001). Lower non‐opiate oral analgesia use in the audit group was not associated with a commensurate increase in opiate use (P = 0·061). There was no difference between groups in length of hospital stay (median (interquartile range) 7 (5–8) versus 6 (5–7) days respectively), septic morbidity or 30‐day mortality rates.
Conclusion
Observance to some aspects of the ERAS protocol was lower outside the clinical trial. However, this made little difference to patient outcome. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Full text