This is the Scientific Surgery Archive, which contains all randomized clinical trials in surgery that have been identified by searching the top 50 English language medical journal issues since January 1998. Compiled by Jonothan J. Earnshaw, former Editor-in-Chief, BJS
Causative factors, surgical treatment and outcome of incisional hernia after liver transplantation. BJS 2002; 89: 1049-1054.
Published: 29th November 2002
Authors: H. Janßen, R. Lange, J. Erhard, M. Malagó, F. W. Eigler, C. E. Broelsch et al.
Background
Little is known about the incidence and causes of herniation, and the results of hernia repair in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Likewise, nothing is known about the best surgical approach for hernia repair.
Method
A retrospective analysis was conducted of the occurrence of incisional hernia in 290 patients who had liver transplantation between 1990 and 2000, and survived more than 6 months. Follow‐up data were obtained from medical records and the outpatient service. Patients were evaluated for various clinical and surgical factors. Hernias were analysed with respect to localization, type of surgical repair and recurrence rate.
Results
Some 17 per cent of the transplanted patients experienced an incisional hernia. Risk factors were acute rejection with affiliated steroid bolus therapy (P = 0·025), a low platelet count after transplantation (P = 0·048), and a transverse abdominal incision with upper midline approach (P = 0·04). Hernias were mainly located at the junction of the transverse and midline incision (P < 0·001) and the recurrence rate was highest here (P = 0·007). Prosthetic hernia repair achieved the lowest rate of recurrence and did not increase the incidence of infectious complications.
Conclusion
Improved immunosuppression should avoid early steroid bolus therapy after transplantation. A low platelet count promotes herniation. Transverse abdominal incision seems to be the best approach for liver transplantation. Prosthetic hernia repair does not increase the complication rate. © 2002 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd
Full text